Overview: Court Induced Parental Alienation
This video shows a real-life experience. Can you spot the multiple ways that created the catalyst for parental alienation?
Comment below what you think they are.
In standard family court litigation, fit parents are routinely told that trial judges have unbounded discretion to divide custody and assign possession schedules. However, controlling Supreme Court jurisprudence strictly establishes that natural parental rights cannot be denied, stripped, or nullified without proving unfitness under strict scrutiny. Understanding these core constitutional protections empowers parents to hold attorneys and trial judges accountable to the law.
Executive Summary & Key Takeaways
- ✓ Exposes the procedural and constitutional defects in standard family court custody proceedings.
- ✓ Explains why fundamental parental rights are protected under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.
- ✓ Equips parents with actionable legal arguments to counter judicial overreach and preserve the record for appeal.
Key Topics & Video Timestamps
Navigate directly to specific topics, arguments, and strategic insights covered in this presentation (1 indexed chapters):
Full Presentation: Court Induced Parental Alienation
Complete presentation (03:33) covering core parental rights and strategic legal arguments.
Constitutional Principles & Controlling Precedents
This presentation directly implicates fundamental constitutional guarantees and controlling appellate precedents:
Cited Judicial Precedents
Constitutional Protections Invoked
Full Video Transcript
This unsuspecting parent thinks that there is no way that the other parent can take the children away. She believes that the Court protects each parent and the child's rights, and her attorney does nothing to protect those rights. If you fight me, none of your children will ever speak to you again. What you are doing is wrong and evil. We'll see about that.
We'll see what the judge thinks. He won't agree with you. I have the children on my side. If only she knew she has rights. It's sad that you don't even care what you are doing to the children. I am protecting them from an evil B*** like you. This Court finds that it is in the best interest of the children to be ripped from the schools they have attended their entire lives and be moved with their father 40 miles away.
This mother doesn't know that she has superior right to determine best interest. They did not prove her unfit or to be a clear and present danger to her children. The mother gets extended standard visitation. Your Honor, I object. The children have always gone to the same schools and lived in the same neighborhood. And I don't see why we don't both get equal time with the children.
You cannot object, you're attorney must do that for you. I have made my ruling. Court dismissed. Thank you Your Honor. Come on Sally. There is nothing you can do. Dad's really happy about something. Yeah, moron, we just lost Mom. Divorce does not make parents bad parents, the court process does. Divorce does not cause parental alienation, the Court's abuse of power does. You know that divorce does not give the judge the right to deny this mother and the children their First Amendment right to be together equally.
Why didn't you do something? You should be sued for malpractice. You took this mother's money and didn't bother protect her constitutional rights. The judge said to let him know if there was any alienation, and he would do something