How do I get my attorney to protect my parental rights? Part 2 of How to Fight for Parental Rights

Arthur is headed to his first court hearing for temporary orders he already has a protective order that has been slapped on him and he has not been allowed to see his children for seven months watches Arthur is forced to teach his attorney in his judge about his room I want you to file the two protection motions that I gave to you Arthur we have gone over this already I think that you should wait on that take small steps in this process this is a very delicate situation you are in why am I in a delicate situation how did it happen when I didn't do anything wrong and I have an attorney you how could it be bad for me for you

to protect my rights just trust me on this Arthur let me handle this you hired me because I am the one trained in the law so let me do my job is this how you see your job as just a job to guide a parent through the process of being screwed by the government here Arthur just let me screw you over quietly I do not agree with your strategy I want you to present these motions to the judge and demand act the court hear argument on these motions before any more trials look at Ernie Wayne I hired you to protect my child and my rights I did not hire you to hold my hand while they

screw me and my child out of our rights and destroy our relationship show me what you have I have these two motions I want you to file them that is an equal protection motion and a due process protection motion and how do you suppose that I explained to the judge today that you should hear these motions before making temporary orders these temporary orders are needed Arthur so that your child is protected that's where you ad and the judge are getting this all wrong orders are needed but not the kind of Court thinks my soon-to-be ex-wife and I protect our children and I need you to protect my rights to do the equal to her

go on the court has not afforded constitutionally adequate procedural protections I want you to use your legal training to get the court to hear these motions I want you to tell the court that justice cannot be served today because the court has not determined what procedural protections they will use according to the fundamental rights at issue the Constitution demands that this court presumed me to be fed out to presume that I am acting in my child's best interest and to recognize that before this court can overcome these presumptions and make a best interest determination over my objections this court must affirmatively show on the record its constitutional authority to act article 6 of the Federal

Constitution mandates that these protections be afforded any state statute to the contrary notwithstanding so you are wanting to challenge the statutes then that has to be done with the legislature this is procedural as you read in the doj letter the court decides the proper constitutional procedure to be used I am asking the court to determine the requirements before they apply those statutes when fundamental rights are at issue and I would like to go over some objections that I would like you to use as necessary why would those be there are three more actually the first one was arguing to the court that justice could not be served today unless they heard these

motions first that we discussed earlier the second one is an objection to jurisdiction not the kind of jurisdiction objection you are probably used to using we are not used to using any of this actually you do it in every criminal case you know very well how to do this objection lack of jurisdiction goes like this in relation to fundamental rights this Court has not yet established its constitutional authority to act in this case today because it has not determined on the record what rights are in question and has not proven a compelling state interest this Court is not authorized to interfere reduce restrict or unduly burden these fundamental rights care custody control

and possession of my child or protected fundamental rights the free association right of me and my child to live together as a family chair the intimacy's have daily interaction is a First Amendment protected right my earnings are my property and they are protected by the fourth and Fourteenth Amendments the fourth amendment specifically provides additional procedural protections for property that this Court has not met you are also wanting to challenge the courts authority and awarding child support yes the court is not going to want to hear that you will be seen as not wanting to support your child that is why I'm asking you to use your legal training to protect me the court has it all wrong there too

they are supposed to presume that I support my child until it has been proven that I have failed to support my child to the same basic minimums that every married parent is required the third objection is an abuse of discretion objection the objection goes like this given the substantive rights at issue protected by the first fourth and Fourteenth Amendments this Court has failed to provide proper procedural constitutionally adequate protections for those rights until the court does so this court lacks any constitutional authority to invade the fundamental right do you have any more yes one more way this one you file in writing as in motion to object to the court if they

refuse to hear these motions you can find an objection on the same website that I got all of this information motions and argument what website is that ww6 family courts calm slash motions the specific wording that I'm using in these objections is important because so it comes from federal appellate court cases in United States Supreme Court cases if this judge knows anything he should recognize this language as I am sure you do I still do not think that it is a good idea for you to do things this way I do not think you understand how things work and how the law works if you are not going to protect my right swing

then what am I paying you for there's really nothing else to understand I understand that I paid you thousands of dollars so that you could hold my hand while my child and I get screwed while you pat me on the back and tell me that you did your best the judge has arrived I will do my best Arthur but no guarantees I cannot believe this I just cannot believe that attorneys do not know this stuff what am I going to do if he does not freeze out those motions Arthur is stuck in a dilemma now where he will be forced to represent himself if his attorney does not fight status quo or he can cross his fingers and hope

that the court does not impose more financial burdens and stress on him than he can handle Arthur faces punishment as severe as jail if he cannot pay some of the bills that the court creates the court can order Arthur to pay for an attorney for his child to pay for custody evaluations to pay for counseling child support alimony his ex's attorney and the list goes on without the rights arguments Arthur could face total devastation and bankruptcy if Arthur is forced to represent himself he also faces so many disadvantages the legal profession keeps a lot of the process secret Arthur will not have the same access as the attorneys to the judge the court

coordinator and other things the only thing that protects Arthur are his rights without these he will be powerless if my lawyer is not going to present these motions I am going to have to do it myself there are support groups that I can go to a fixed family courts where I can practice and learn more ww6 family courts calm / webinars