THE PROOFS

1. Standing defects deprive judges of judicial subject matter jurisdiction
2. Rights of child and parents are individually protected
3. Best interests of the child impose unjust and illegitimate penalties on the child and the parents
4. Best interest nullifies rights and constitutional guarantees upon filing of the SAPCR suit
5. Custody orders impose prior restraints on strictly protected speech, association, worship, and family privacy
6. US Supreme Court holds that best interest is insufficient to overcome compelling justification prior restraint protections
7. Texas Attorney General holds that custody orders must survive strict scrutiny and compelling justification standard
8. Child Custody Orders are Void, Child Support Orders are Void
9. Title IV-D pays states for predetermined judicial outcomes that compell labor upon void judicial orders
10. "Income-based" child support ties your labor to legal penalties imposed through nonexistent judicial contempt power
11. Holding parents to be Intentionally under-employed to impose punishment compels labor
12. UPLC punishments against parents discussing constitutional rights covers up the crime
13. Attorneys making objectively unreasonabel legal claims that you have no rights meets the recklessly disregard standard
14. Law firm managing partners permitting objectively unreasonable claims is failure to supervise
15. Texas Supreme Court Justices violate their oaths to protect the judiciary
16. Every affected child is irreparably injured for judicial profits

These proofs with fully cited explanations for how they apply and for how state surpeme court judges are lying to protect the criminal conspiracy are far beyond what anyone needs to get this before a federal judge and the forced labor statutes guarantee access to a federal court.

You don't have to sue any judges or even any state actors. You can sue your ex, or their attorney, or the GAL, or the supervised visitation center, or your own attorney for failing to protect your rights. There is NO immunity for these people under forced labor and there is NO state actor requirement. Judicial immunity can NOT be used to prevent you from proving that the family code is unconstituitonal, that your orders are void, and that you have been converted into an indentured servant to the benefit of everyone who profits from this organized crime venture.

The forced labor statutes clearly grant organized crime witness protection status which invokes RICO and its treble damages relief. The statute of limitations is ten years and you get fully paid before anyone else gets a penny.

If a massive law firm has only one attorney who is guilty of these crimes, then every partner in that firm is potentially lible for damanges and criminal charges.

If a massive consulting company has one tiny little department generating revenues from Title ID-Consulting, then every partner in that firm is potentially lible for damanges and criminal charges.

Ask yourself, if you were a rich partner who had nothing whatsoever to do with family law and you were informed by this document's proofs that you could be liable simply for cashing your shared profits check, what would you do? I would demand an immediate full partner vote to divest the partnership of all liability producing activities. I would fire them all, each and every one. But, that's just me. I don't particularly like being caged.

All that is required is that this document be served on them. If one partner is noticed, they are all noticed. Failure to act, results in establishing reckless disregard. When one parent proves in federal court that state judges can NOT nullify federal rights upon the mere filing of a custody suit or deny rights under a state duty claim, proving your entitlement to relief becomes little more than paint by numbers.

Somewhere out there is a large capable law firm with NO family law connections or practice, maybe one made up largely of former federal prosecutors, and they will quickly realize just how rich they can become not only from this suit alone, but from having most of their competition disbarred and placed behind bars for the next 20-years.